Legal Opinion

De Goey v. Hermsen

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1939PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

Defendants claim that the answers of the jury are not sustained by the evidence; that as a matter of law plaintiff Amelia De Goey was at least fifty per cent negligent; and that the damages are excessive. The nature of the contentions requires a review of the facts.

Plaintiff Amelia De Goey, a married woman thirty-eight years of age, accompanied by her husband, drove to Little Chute about 7 o’clock in the evening on January IS, 1938. She parked her car on the south side of Main street. Main street runs east and west, and parallel parking was the rule upon that street. She and her husband…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Engstrum v. Sentinel Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Field v. VinogradWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Post v. ThomasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Lang v. RogneyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953
  4. Ledvina v. EbertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Weber v. BarrettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API