Legal Opinion
Perez v. State Racing Commission
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided December 18, 1986PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCutter, J.
Perez on January 11, 1986, held an assistant trainer’s license issued to him by the State Racing Commission *269(the Commission). He was employed then by Anthony Manzo, at Ogden Suffolk Downs Race Track (the track) and was engaged in his duties in Manzo’s barn on premises at and owned by the track. He was taken into custody there by a State trooper and others. They led him to a “tack room”. There he was searched and was accused by employees of the track and the State police of selling drugs.
The foregoing circumstances are set forth (a) on the basis of allegations in Perez’s substitute complaint…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. BiswellSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bowsher v. SynarSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hotchkiss v. State Racing CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
- Foxboro Harness, Inc. v. State Racing CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
- Commonwealth v. FossaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
- Commonwealth v. RosenthalMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
- Barrington Fair Ass'n v. State Racing CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989