Legal Opinion

State v. Reiley

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 15, 1882PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Audrain Circuit Court. — Hon. G-. Porter, J udge. . Indictment against a druggist for selling liquor to be drunk on the premises, without license.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, C. J.

We think it very clear that the section under which the defendant was indicted, (Sees. Acts 1877, p. 342, § 1,) makes it punishable as a misdemeanor for a druggist: 1st, To sell or give away, except for medicinal purposes,' intoxicating liquors in any quantity less than one gallon, without taking out a license as a dram-shop-keeper. 2nd, To permit such intoxicating liquors, no matter for what purpose sold, nor in what quantity sold, to be drunk on the premises where sold unless the druggist has a license as aforesaid. This section is so plain that time will not be wasted in its discussion.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barnes v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1849
  2. State v. BakerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. HeinzeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. State v. HecklerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  3. State v. MeagherMissouri Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. State v. McAdooSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  5. Moore v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API