Legal Opinion

Deadrich v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 23, 1933PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

This is an application for leave to prosecute appeal in the above-entitled action in forma pauperis. The application is not opposed.

Appellant states that the trial court denied a similar application by reason of the failure of the attorneys representing appellant to make an affidavit of poverty, basing his decision on our decision in Chetkovich v. United States, 47 F.(2d) 894. In the Chetkovich Case the application was denied with leave to renew it on a proper showing. It appears from the record that after the rendition of this opinion the attorneys filed disclaimers as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Randolph v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
  2. Chetkovich v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Adkins v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Tunheim v. BowmanDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1973
  3. Bolt v. Reynolds Metal Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API