Deadrich v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR, Circuit Judge.
This is an application for leave to prosecute appeal in the above-entitled action in forma pauperis. The application is not opposed.
Appellant states that the trial court denied a similar application by reason of the failure of the attorneys representing appellant to make an affidavit of poverty, basing his decision on our decision in Chetkovich v. United States, 47 F.(2d) 894. In the Chetkovich Case the application was denied with leave to renew it on a proper showing. It appears from the record that after the rendition of this opinion the attorneys filed disclaimers as…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States ex rel. Randolph v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
- Chetkovich v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
3Cited by3 opinions
- Adkins v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Tunheim v. BowmanDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1973
- Bolt v. Reynolds Metal Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1941