Chetkovich v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
The affidavit in support of the application for leave to prosecute the appeal in this case in forma pauperis avers: “There is no person interested by contract or otherwise in the said cause of action or entitled to share, in the recovery thereunder who is able to pay or secure said fees or costs.” Such an affidavit is insufficient. In cases of this kind the affidavit must be made by every person interested in the recovery, including the attorney, if he has a direct interest in the result of the action. United States v. Ross (C. C. A.) 298 F. 64, and eases there cited.
The application is…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States ex rel. Randolph v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
3Cited by9 opinions
- Adkins v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- HOME OWNERS'LOAN CORPORATION v. HuffmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- Quittner v. Motion Picture Producers & Distributors of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- Clark v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1932
- Deadrich v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.