Smith v. Rowland
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 90, Oct. T., 1913,' by plaintiff, from decree of O. P. No. 2, Allegheny Co., April T., 1912, No. 1809, in Equity dismissing bill in equity for an injunction in case of S. L. Smith v. Richard A, Rowland and Colonial Amusement Company. Bill in equity to restrain defendants from using an alley.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 90, Oct. T., 1913,' by plaintiff, from decree of O. P. No. 2, Allegheny Co., April T., 1912, No. 1809, in Equity dismissing bill in equity for an injunction in case of S. L. Smith v. Richard A, Rowland and Colonial Amusement Company. Bill in equity to restrain defendants from using an alley. On final hearing Shafer, J., filed the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: The bill is for an injunction to restrain the use by the defendants of an alleyway adjoining theaters belonging to them in the Borough of Wilkinsburg in Allegheny County. FINDINGS OF FACT. 1. By deed…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The decree is affirmed .on the findings of fact and conclusions of law by Judge Shafer.
2Cited by16 opinions
- Hess v. WesterwickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Richard Paul, Inc. v. Union Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
- Schroer v. BrooksMissouri Court of Appeals · 1920
- Gailey v. Wilkinsburg Real Estate Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Pencader Associates, Inc. v. Glasgow TrustSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.