Legal Opinion
Tokio Marine & Fire Ins. v. National Union Fire Ins.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 25, 1937PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PATTERSON, District Judge.
The Tokio Marine & Fire Insurance Company brought an action at law against National Union Fire Insurance Company to recover $187,500 on a policy of reinsurance. The complaint alleged that the Tokio, *721having issued a policy to S. H. Kress & Co. covering buildings and contents against loss from earthquake and other causes, obtained a policy of reinsurance from the National Union, such reinsurance being excess reinsurance for the amount of the excess over the first $100,000 due by the Tokio in the case of each loss; that a loss occurred by earthquake in California on…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Thompson v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Simmons Creek Coal Co. v. DoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Snell v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Moffett, Hodgkins & Clarke Co. v. RochesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Hearne v. Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Home InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Volker v. the Conn. Fire Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- Frank A. Gibson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
- In Re SchickUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1999