United States v. Tidball
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the First Judicial District in and for the County of Pima. William H. Barnes, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Per curiam
It appears from the certificate of the clerk of the district court, indorsed thereon, that the transcript filed in this ease was on demand handed to the United States attorney for Arizona, and by him taken from the clerk’s office on the 9th of September, 1889. The transcript, as delivered, contained no assignment of errors, and it also appears from the clerk’s certificate that none had previously been filed. The United States attorney attempted to *385supply the omission by filing with said district clerk an assignment of errors, on the thirty-first day of December, more than three months after…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Whitney v. DeweyIdaho Supreme Court · 1905
- Hollenbeck v. LoudenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
- Wootan v. RotenArizona Supreme Court · 1917
- Coffin v. CoffinNevada Supreme Court · 1917
- Keyser v. ShuteArizona Supreme Court · 1892
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.