Legal Opinion
Delahunty v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided July 1, 1999No. 3:98-cv-01688PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE TO STAY AND COMPEL ARBITRATION
EGINTON, Senior District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
In her complaint plaintiff Karen Dela-hunty (“Delahunty”), advances three claims against her former employer, Morgan Stanley Dean Witter (“MSDW”). The first claim is pursuant to Title VII and alleges gender discrimination. The second claim is that the termination of her employment was the result of the defendant’s retaliation against her for exposing the unlawful transactions of one of its managers. The third claim is for the intentional infliction of emotional distress.
De…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ryder Energy Distribution Corporation v. Merrill Lynch Commodities Inc., E.F. Hutton & Co., Inc., and New York Mercantile ExchangeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Perkins v. New England CollegeDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2024