Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Rothko
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided September 7, 1972PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Millard L. Midonick, S.
In this proceeding for the suspension and ultimate removal of the executors, a temporary restraining order was requested (69 Mise 2d 752). By a prior order of this court dated June 26, 1972 the respondent executors and art galleries were restrained from selling or otherwise disposing of paintings executed by the testator. The restraining order permitted sales only upon application to the court on notice to the *321attorneys for the parties. In the court’s opinion (N. Y. L. J., June 27,1972, p. 13, col. 1), a further hearing was scheduled for July 18,1972 and the suggestion…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- In re the Accounting of HubbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. CannonNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Matter of People (Bond & Mtge. Guar. Co.)New York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Wilmerding v. . McKessonNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re the Estate of RothkoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1975
- In re the Estate of YoungNew York Surrogate's Court · 1975
- Estate of Reis v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1986
- In Re the Estate of RothkoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1974
- In re the Estate of RothkoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.