Legal Opinion
In Re the Estate of Rothko
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided October 22, 1974PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Millard L. Midonick, S.
A motion is made to quash a subpoena issued by the attorneys for two of the executors of this estate.
The pending proceeding was instituted to revoke letters testamentary and for other relief. The fundamental issues are alleged wrongdoing of the three executors of this estate and the respondent art dealers in entering into two contracts for the sale and consignment for sale of paintings executed by the testator. A more detailed outline of the triable issues may be found in prior decisions in this proceeding (Matter of Rothko, 69 Misc 2d 752; 71 Misc 2d 320, affd. 40 A D…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Kraushaar Bros. & Co. v. ThorpeNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
- In re the Estate of RothkoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1972
- In re the Estate of RothkoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1972
- People ex rel. Deuel v. ShawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- Reda v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1970
3Cited by6 opinions
- Estate of Reis v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1986
- Civil Aeronautics Board v. Scottish-American Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1976
- Kridos v. VinskusDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Krumme v. West Point-Pepperell, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- In re the Estate of RothkoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.