Legal Opinion

General Motors Corporation v. Shannon

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided November 2, 1959PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Terry, President Judge:

This is an action under the Workmen’s Compensation Statute. The sole question presented is whether claimant, an employee of employer, sustained a “serious and permanent facial or head disfigurement” within the meaning of sub-paragraph (f) of Section 2326 of Title 19 of the Code of 1953.

“(f) The Board shall award proper and equitable compensation for serious and permanent facial or head disfigurement; such compensation shall be paid to the employee at the rate of 60 per cent of his weekly wages for a period of not more than 150 weeeks.”

Claimant’s alleged disfigurement…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Poole v. Saxon MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
  2. Dallachiesa v. General Motors CorporationSuperior Court of Delaware · 1958
  3. Mitchum v. Inman MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1946
  4. Chisholm v. Jahncke Dry Docks, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. General Motors Corp. v. VaccariniSuperior Court of Delaware · 1952

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Advisory Opinion Re Constitutionality of 1972 PA 294Michigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Falcone v. BrankerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  3. City of Wilmington v. Delaware Coach CompanyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1967
  4. Olson Brothers, Inc. v. EnglehartSupreme Court of Delaware · 1968
  5. City of Wilmington v. Delaware Coach Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API