Chisholm v. Jahncke Dry Docks, Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWesterfield, J.
This is a suit under the Compensation Law. The sole question presented is whether plaintiff, an employee of defendant, was “seriously permanently disfigured about the face” within the meaning of clause 16 of paragraph (d) subsection 1, section 8 of Act 85 of 1926.
Plaintiff’s alleged disfigurement consists of a scar three centimeters in length and one-third of a centimeter in width, running diagonally along the left side of his face in the region of the chin, which according to the medical testimony in the record, will gradually bleach out and narrow, become ies.s apparent, and eventually be…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Dickson v. United States Sheet & Window Glass Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
- Desoto v. Magnolia Pipe Line Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1928
3Cited by7 opinions
- Falcone v. BrankerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- Ousley v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Company of WisconsinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960
- Templet v. Travelers Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
- Mitchum v. Inman MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1946
- General Motors Corporation v. ShannonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.