Rambus, Inc. v. Infineon Technologies AG
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PAYNE, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the motion of the Defendants, Infineon Technologies AG, Infineon Technologies North America Corporation and Infineon Technologies Holding North America, Inc. (hereinafter collectively “Infineon”) to compel production of documents being withheld from production by the Plaintiff Rambus, Inc. (“Rambus”) under claims of attorney-client and work product privilege. Specifically, this is a continued consideration of Infineon’s Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Testimony Relating to Rambus’ Document Retention,…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. ZolinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. WeintraubSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Mark N. Silvestri v. General Motors Corporation, Dfendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Rambus, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2005
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Rambus, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2006
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Rambus, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2005
- United Bank v. BuckinghamDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2018
- Koch v. Specialized Care Services, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.