National Union Fire Insurance Co. v. Maune
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, Presiding Judge.
Due to a motor-vehicle accident and consequent litigation between family members Ryan and Brant Maune, we must determine the amount of coverage afforded under a motor-vehicle liability policy, which contains a household-exclusion provision. The insurer, National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA, argues that the household-exclusion provision limits its obligation to $25,000 for the claim. The insured, Brant Maune, contends that the household-exclusion provision is ambiguous and unenforceable, thus affording him the full $100,000 in liability…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Hoffman Construction Co. of Alaska v. Fred S. James & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Seeck v. Geico General Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2007
- Krombach v. Mayflower Ins. Co., Ltd.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1992
- Todd Ex Rel. Todd v. Missouri United School Insurance CouncilSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- O'Rourke v. Esurance Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- Hall v. Allstate Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2012
- Maritz Holdings, Inc. v. Federal Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2009
- Christensen v. Farmers Ins. Co., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- Affirmative Insurance Co. v. BroekerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.