Legal Opinion

National Union Fire Insurance Co. v. Maune

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 6, 2009No. ED 90690PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, Presiding Judge.

Due to a motor-vehicle accident and consequent litigation between family members Ryan and Brant Maune, we must determine the amount of coverage afforded under a motor-vehicle liability policy, which contains a household-exclusion provision. The insurer, National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA, argues that the household-exclusion provision limits its obligation to $25,000 for the claim. The insured, Brant Maune, contends that the household-exclusion provision is ambiguous and unenforceable, thus affording him the full $100,000 in liability…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Hoffman Construction Co. of Alaska v. Fred S. James & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Seeck v. Geico General Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2007
  4. Krombach v. Mayflower Ins. Co., Ltd.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  5. Todd Ex Rel. Todd v. Missouri United School Insurance CouncilSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. O'Rourke v. Esurance Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Hall v. Allstate Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Maritz Holdings, Inc. v. Federal Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Christensen v. Farmers Ins. Co., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Affirmative Insurance Co. v. BroekerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API