Legal Opinion

Pitts v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 28, 1996No. 0658-95PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

MEYERS, Judge.

Appellant pled guilty before the trial court to possession of a controlled substance, and his punishment was assessed at confinement for thirty-five years. The Court of Appeals reversed the conviction, holding there was no evidence in the record to support Appellant’s plea of guilty as required by Article 1.15, V.A.C.C.P. 1 Pitts v. State, 896 S.W.2d 802 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1994). We granted the State’s petition to address the correctness of that holding.

During the plea proceedings, counsel for Appellant announced that Appellant…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hicks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  2. Killion v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  3. Canada v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  4. Rexford v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1991
  5. Emerson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. Ybarra v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
  2. Hayden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
  3. Carson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018
  4. McDougal v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003
  5. Thieleman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API