Sallee v. Bugge Canning Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
The interpretation and effect of the Laws of 1897, chapter 71, § 26, p. 149 (since repealed), and Laws of 1907, chapter 173 (Rem. Rev. Stat., § 162; since amended), are before the court on this appeal.
In 1906, the state of Washington entered into an executory real-estate contract (being No. 3022) with John D. Dow and George Simpson, whereby it agreed to sell and they agreed to buy tidelands in Jefferson county having a frontage of 217.85 chains. By various assignments, the respondent (and by “respondent” we refer to A. A. Bugge, as trustee of the Bugge Canning Company) became the owner of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- McKnight v. BasilidesWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- Huber v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Baylis v. KerrickWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Lara v. SandellWashington Supreme Court · 1909
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fitzgerald v. Neves, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1976
- Gazin v. HieberCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972