Legal Opinion

United States v. Mims

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided June 18, 2008No. 0:08-cv-00007PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JAMES M. ROSENBAUM, Chief Judge.

Defendants Nyberg and Kreisel object to the Report and Recommendation, issued May 12, 2008 [Docket No. 89], by the Honorable Janie S. Mayeron, United States Magistrate Judge. The Report recommended denying defendants’ motions to suppress statements and evidence. Defendants’ objections to the Report were timely filed, pursuant to Local Rule 72.2.

Based upon a de novo review of the record herein, the Court adopts the Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. Jimmie Glen Mims’ Motion to Suppress Evidence Obtained as a Result of…

2Cases cited85 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. DuranDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2015
  2. United States v. PapeDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API