Legal Opinion

State v. Anaya

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 28, 1990No. 1 CA-CR 88-1274PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TAYLOR, Judge.

Appellant Freddie Arthur Anaya (“defendant”) was charged by information with two counts of aggravated assault in violation of A.R.S. § 13-1204, and one count of reckless endangerment in violation of A.R.S. § 13-1201. Subsequently, the prosecution alleged that the offenses were of a dangerous nature. The jury found defendant guilty of all charges. Defendant was sentenced to a mitigated sentence of one and one-half years on the endangerment charge and a mitigated term of five years on each assault charge, with all sentences to run concurrently. Defendant filed a timely…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Delaware v. FenstererSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. McDougall v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. State v. JeffersArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  4. United States v. Eneas Lavern NickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  5. Keefe v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1937

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. RileyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  2. State v. BeasleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  3. State v. ParksCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  4. State v. DelgadoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  5. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API