Legal Opinion

Zimmerman v. Lamb

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 15, 1862PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT OOURT OF NICOLLET COUNTY. There was a verdict in the Court below in this cause in favor of the Plaintiff for $401.03. The Defendants moved for a new trial, wbicb motion was sustained. The Plaintiff appeals from this order.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court

Atwateb, J.

This was an action brought by the Appellant to recover the value and damages for the alleged wrongful taking of certain personal property by the Defendants. The answer set up a justification, alleging that the property had been seized by Lamb as Sheriff of Nicollet county, under and by virtue of a warrant of attachment issued out of the District Court of the Third Judicial District, in an action in which George W. Piper was Plaintiff, and one John Johnston Defendant, and alleging that the property belonged to said Johnston. The answer alleges that the warrant of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Derby v. GallupSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1860
  2. Burt v. McKinstrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1860

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. First National Bank of Mankato v. WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  2. Northern Pacific Railroad v. PaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Humphrey v. HavensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1867
  4. Anderson v. HultbergCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1918
  5. Braley v. ByrnesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API