Legal Opinion

Butler v. Estrella Raisin Vineyard Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1899No. S. F. No. 930PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court -of Fresno County and from an order denying a new trial. E. W. Risley, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

' HAYNES, C.

Action in claim and delivery to recover possession of fourteen thousand nine hundred and seventy-nine *241raisin trays, or their value, alleged to he fifteen hundred dollars. A jury trial was had and a verdict returned for defendants, and the plaintiffs appealed from the judgment entered thereon and from an order denying their motion for a new trial.

The business of the plaintiffs is indicated by the name or style of the copartnership. The Estrella Raisin Vineyard Company is a corporation engaged in the cultivation of raisin grapes, and defendant Taft is its superintendent and manager.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Daft v. DrewAppellate Court of Illinois · 1891
  2. Kerns v. McKeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Watrous v. CunninghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Willard v. ArcherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of CoverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Jackson v. FrierSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
  3. Wagoner v. CaskeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  4. Yoshizumi v. Platt Produce CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API