Kerns v. McKean
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Cruz County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcKinstry, J.
This is an action for the recovery of the possession of a certain tract of land.
*88One Patterson, being the owner of the premises herein demanded, entered into a written contract with one Sanford, since deceased, for the sale to the latter of the land for the consideration of $3,336, with interest,— $500 by exchange of lands at the making of the agreement, and the balance to be paid in four equal annual installments. Sanford, the purchaser, was also to pay all taxes. And it was further agreed that if any default should be made in any payment of principal, or interest, or taxes, the whole…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Nickle v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1842
- Lyman & Co. v. BechtelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
3Cited by8 opinions
- Chan Kiu Sing v. GordonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Shreve v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
- People v. TorresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Kerns v. DeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Colburn v. ParrettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.