Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Oberlander v. Eddington

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 28, 1964No. 39615Published

1Concurrence

HALLEY, Vice Chief Justice

(specially concurring).

I concur in the result of the foregoing opinion but arrive at the same conclusion by a different route.

The principal question we have here is who inherited the one-half interest in the land which Wilma Gangloff Eddington was awarded in the probate proceeding in Jackson County ? The husband and father, Plarold Eddington, Sr., contends here that he inherited one-half of the one-half that his wife Wilma took under her father’s will and that her remainder was set aside *894to her in final decree of the County Court of Jackson County on May 20, 1914.

His…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chism v. ReeseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  2. Brown v. BrownNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Faris v. NickelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  4. Whitmore v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Indiana Railway Co. v. MorganIndiana Supreme Court · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API