Legal Opinion

Limit v. Maleng

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided October 17, 1994No. C94-162RPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ CROSS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ROTHSTEIN, District Judge.

THIS MATTER comes before the court on plaintiffs’ and defendants’ cross-motions for summary judgment. Having reviewed the motions together with all documents filed in support and in opposition, and being fully advised, the court finds and rules as follows:

7. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs in this ease challenge the constitutionality of RCW 29.79.490(2), which makes it illegal to pay gatherers of signatures on initiative and referendum petitions on a per…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. First Nat. Bank of Boston v. BellottiSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Burdick v. TakushiSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Burson v. FreemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Prete v. BradburyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  2. Sane Transit v. Sound TransitWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Waremart v. Progressive Campaigns, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Initiative & Referendum Institute v. JaegerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  5. Term Limits Leadership Council, Inc. v. ClarkDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API