Legal Opinion

Drainage District No. 6 v. Snohomish River Boom Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1927No. 20218. Department TwoPublished

1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, C. J.

The appellant is organized under the drainage district law for the purpose of draining certain property on the Ehey slough, which is a navigable branch of the Snohomish river; and has constructed a dike along the slough bank. The respondent is organized as a boom company for the purpose of rafting, driving and booming logs; and on the Sno-homish river, about a quarter of a mile above the entrance to Ebey slough, has maintained for more than twenty years a sheer boom for the purpose of diverting the logs coming downstream through the slough to its booming grounds below the slough’s mouth. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burrows v. Grays Harbor Boom Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Mitchell v. Lea Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Barry v. MurrayWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Gilson v. Cascade Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API