Legal Opinion

Ludwick, Extr. v. Banet

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 10, 1955No. 18,579PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPfaff, J.

The appellee, Richard Banet, brought this action to contest the Will of his mother, Mildred M. Hobbs, deceased. His complaint alleged that the Will was invalid for the reason that the testatrix, Mildred M. Hobbs, did not have the necessary testamentary capacity; that the Will was obtained under undue *467influence; and that the Will of the testatrix was unduly executed.

The appellant, James K. Ludwiek, and the appellee, Richard Banet, were half-brothers and the sons of Mildred M. Hobbs. Richard Banet was born to Mildred M. Hobbs out of wedlock, and was adopted when he was a small boy by Frank and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Barr v. SumnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Wiley v. GordonIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Goodbar v. LidikeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Daugherty v. DaughertyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1944
  5. Hicks v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1898

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. CAULDWELL, INC. v. PattersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1962
  2. McElhinney v. KellyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
  3. McCARTNEY, ETC. v. REXIndiana Court of Appeals · 1957
  4. McCartney v. RexIndiana Court of Appeals · 1957
  5. Lindinger v. LINDINGERIndiana Court of Appeals · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API