Legal Opinion
Nistico v. District Court, County of Montrose
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided May 29, 1990No. 89SA480PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Vollack
Julie Ann Nistico (Nistico) petitions for relief pursuant to C.A.R. 21 from the order of the District Court for the County of Montrose (the district court) 1 denying Nis-tico’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We issued a rule to show cause and now make the rule absolute.
I
Michael David Nelson (Nelson) filed in the district court a petition under the Uniform Parentage Act, §§ 19-4-101 to 19-4-129, 8B C.R.S. (Supp.1989) (the Parentage Act), for a determination and order relating to the parentage, custody, visitation, support, and other rights, privileges, duties, and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Nehra v. UhlarNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- City & County of Denver v. Juvenile CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
- Plas v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Barden v. BlauSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Steinman v. SteinmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- L.G. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- In Re the Marriage of PritchettColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
- In Re Marriage of TonnessenColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
- G.B. v. Arapahoe County CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- In re the Custody of K.R.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.