Legal Opinion

Patrick v. Comm'r

United States Tax Court

Decided February 24, 2014No. Docket No. 16387-12Published

P-H received two monetary awards for bringing qui tam complaints filed under the False Claims Act (FCA), 31 U.S.C. sec. 3730 (2006). Ps reported the awards as capital gains. R issued a deficiency notice that disallowed capital gains treatment and characterized the awards as other income.

Read the full summary

P-H received two monetary awards for bringing qui tam complaints filed under the False Claims Act (FCA), 31 U.S.C. sec. 3730 (2006). Ps reported the awards as capital gains. R issued a deficiency notice that disallowed capital gains treatment and characterized the awards as other income. R contends that a qui tam award does not result from the sale or exchange of a capital asset, citing I.R.C. sec. 1222(1), (3). Ps contend that under the FCA the relator sells information to the Government in exchange for a share of any recovery. Ps further argue that the right to receive a share of the…

1Opinion of the Court

CRAIG PATRICK AND MICHELE PATRICK, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Patrick v. Comm'r

Docket No. 16387-12.

United States Tax Court

142 T.C. 124; 2014 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 5; 142 T.C. No. 5;

February 24, 2014, Filed

Decision will be entered for respondent.

P-H received two monetary awards for bringing qui tam complaints filed under the False Claims Act (FCA), 31 U.S.C. sec. 3730 (2006). Ps reported the awards as capital gains. R issued a deficiency notice that disallowed capital gains treatment and characterized the awards as other income.

R contends that a qui tam award does…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Commissioner v. P. G. Lake, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Commissioner v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Helvering v. William Flaccus Oak Leather Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API