Legal Opinion

Binek v. Binek

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 2004No. 20030154PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Ruth Binek appealed from a divorce judgment enforcing a premarital agreement between her and Theodore Binek and denying her request for spousal support. We affirm the trial court’s decision enforcing the premarital agreement, and reverse and remand for further consideration regarding spousal support.

I

[¶ 2] Ruth and Theodore Binek were married on June 21, 1984. At the time of the marriage, Ruth Binek was fifty-two years old and Theodore Binek was sixty-one years old. It was the second marriage for both parties, and both had children from their prior marriages.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Simeone v. SimeoneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Kautzman v. KautzmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Weir v. WeirNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. National Bank of Harvey v. International Harvester Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Miller v. SchwartzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Vann v. VannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Sailer v. SailerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Jangula v. JangulaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Pember v. ShapiroNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Bernabucci v. HuberNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API