Legal Opinion

Dominique v. Ralph D. Kaiser Co., Inc.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 23, 1984No. 83-884PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of appellees, defendants below, after a non-jury trial in an action for negligence. The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying appellant’s motion for a jury trial, filed twenty months after the complaint. We need not decide whether the court committed error, because even if there was error, we would have to find it harmless. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment.

I

One afternoon in March 1979, as seven-year-old Carol Dominique was on her way home from school, she was struck by a car while crossing New York Avenue at Fourth…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Pernell v. Southall RealtySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Hornblower v. George Washington UniversityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1908
  4. Garces v. BradleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Kass v. BaskinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Interdonato v. InterdonatoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Pearson v. Soo ChungDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Pers Travel, Inc. v. Canal Square AssociatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Williams v. Dudley Trust FoundationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Conner v. 1747 Pennsylvania Avenue Associates, L.P.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API