Mitchell v. State

KELLER, P.J., and PRICE, JOHNSON, KEASLER, HOLCOMB, and COCHRAN, JJ., joined.

The question in this case is whether the appellant has established his claim that he *642was denied effective assistance of counsel because his attorney permitted him to wear, at the start of voir dire, a shirt that incriminated him. The record does not support his claim.

This case is before us a second time. On appeal, a panel of the Fourth Court of Appeals reversed the conviction because of the claim of ineffective assistance.1 We granted review, reversed the judgment of the Court of Appeals, and remanded the case to…