Legal Opinion

Gilliam v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 21, 2012No. Nos. 08-CF-475, 08-CF-504, 08-CF-505Published

1Concurrence 1

RUIZ, Associate Judge, Retired, concurring:

The opinion for the court does not address whether the prosecutor’s comments on the meaning of reasonable doubt were improper. Although I agree that in this case, the comments were rendered harmless by the trial court’s final correct instructions and the strength of the government’s case, I write separately to explain why I think the prosecutor’s comments in rebuttal were improper, to urge that prosecutors not attempt to restate in their arguments to the jury the carefully calibrated instruction on reasonable doubt the court endorsed in Smith v.…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Schwelb.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Victor v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Herring v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API