State v. Edsall
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Slaby, Judge.
William Edsall appeals from his convictions for two counts of aggravated burglary. We affirm.
Edsall was arrested and indicted in connection with two burglaries that occurred during the spring of 1995. Because he was indigent, the court appointed an attorney to represent him. Edsall’s appointed attorney served throughout the pretrial phase of the case. On the scheduled trial date, Edsall’s attorney told the court that Edsall no longer wanted his services. The trial judge stated that Edsall could hire a new attorney or could proceed pro se, with the appointed attorney sitting at…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- State v. UngerOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. GibsonOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. BlankenshipOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. GordonOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
- State v. Beckett, 06 Ha 584 (6-21-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. GregoryOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
- State v. StewartOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. TinglerOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.