Legal Opinion
Gorman v. Covidien, LLC
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 19, 2015No. 13 Civ. 6486 (KPF)PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KATHERINE POLK FAILLA, District Judge: -
John Gorman brings claims for discrimination and retaliation1 under both the New York State and New York City Human Rights Laws, as well as a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress, naming as Defendants his former employer, Covidien Sales, LLC (“Covidien”), and his former supervisor, Dale Kelly. Defendants have moved for summary judgment on all claims. For the reasons set forth in this Opinion, the Court grants Defendants’ motion in part and denies it in part.
BACKGROUND1
A. Factual Background
1. Gorman’s Employment History…
2Cases cited78 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Smith v. City of N.Y.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Chau v. DonovanDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Cater v. New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Hill v. New York City Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Marinen v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.