Legal Opinion · Dissent

Continental Casualty Co. v. Lolley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 1, 1943No. 29779Published

1DissentOsborn, J.

The pivotal point upon which the decision in this case turns is whether or not the phrase “fixed by law,” as used in the contract of insurance, is ambiguous. I am not in accord with the view of the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Guenther, 281 U. S. 34, 74 L. Ed. 683, 72 A. L. R. 1064, wherein the court, in dealing with a situation practically identical with that presented here, held that the phrase is free from ambiguity. The question before us is not a federal question, and while the decision of the highest federal court is entitled…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. GuentherSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Taylor v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Cunningham v. Ponca CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Morgan v. WheelerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  5. Bradley v. RenfrowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API