Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Ponca City

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 10, 1911No. 656PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Error from District Court, Kay County; W. M. Bowles, Judge. Action by W. E. Cunmngliam against the city of Ponca City. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

A 'temporary injunction was issued by the county judge of Kay county, in the absence from said county of the district judge, enjoining the defendant in error from entering upon certain land of plaintiff in error and attempting to appropriate any part of it for sewer, sewer outlet, or sewer outfall purposes, or from emptying its sewerage into a certain creek thereon. After a hearing, the district court found that said “temporary injunction ought not to have been issued” and dissolved the same. On said hearing a copy of an ordinance, which was not certified to and which was passed by the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Edwards v. MillarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Watt v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Johnson v. City of TulsaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1953
  2. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. SavageSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Bradley v. RenfrowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Smilie v. Taft Stadium Board of ControlSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  5. Barton v. HarmonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API