State ex rel. Prosecuting Attorney v. City of South Park
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Albertson, J., entered July 14, 1903, upon motion of the defendant after the opening statement of plaintiff’s counsel, dismissing an action to test the legality of the incorporation of the defendant.
1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.
This is a proceeding in the nature of quo warranto, the purpose of which, as stated in appellant’s brief, is to “test the incorporation of respondent, and to determine whether it is properly incorporated as a city of the fourth class under the laws of Washington.” The information charges irregularities as to notice and amendment of petition for incorporation; also that illegal votes were cast at the incorporation election, and that votes were illegally counted for incorporation. The answer denies these charges. At the trial the issues were narrowed by the statement of relator’s counsel that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Painter v. PainterOhio Supreme Court · 1849
- People v. Rensselaer & Saratoga Rail RoadNew York Supreme Court · 1836
- People ex rel. Weber v. City of Spring ValleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
- State ex rel. Summers v. UridilNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
- People ex rel. Attorney-General v. StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Armstrong v. State Ex Rel. FainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Tallmadge v. WalkerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916