Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Summers v. Uridil

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1893No. 6102PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Original proceeding in nature of quo warranto.

1Opinion of the Court

Irvine, 0.

This is an information in the nature of quo warranto, alleging that the respondents, conspiring to usurp the franchise and power to license the traffic in intoxicating liquors, and enjoy its revenue in a place in Butler county known as Abie, procured upon a piece of paper the signatures of certain persons, and thereafter made a writing in the form of a petition, praying for the incorporation, as a village, of said place of Abie, and fraudulently attached said signatures to said writing, making the same' falsely to appear as a petition in due form by a majority of the taxable…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. The People v. . CarpenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  2. People ex rel. Scrafford v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  3. State ex rel. Lindholm v. ParkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878
  4. State ex rel. O'Sullivan v. CoffeeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Consol. Independent Sch. Dist. of Troy MillsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  2. State Ex Rel. Larson v. MorrisonNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  3. People ex rel. Saunier v. StrattonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905
  4. State ex rel. Loy v. MoteNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Osborn v. Village of OaklandNebraska Supreme Court · 1896

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API