Legal Opinion

Jacobson v. Parda Federal Credit Union

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1998No. 105050, Calendar No. 16PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*320Cavanagh, J.

The case calls on us to decide whether the plaintiffs action, which was successful on the merits before a jury, was barred by the statute of limitations prescribed by the Whistleblowers’ Protection Act.1 Because the plaintiff has alleged and proven an act by her employer in violation of the Whistleblowers’ Protection Act within the limitation period, we find that her action is not barred.

The plaintiff filed her action on January 19, 1990, ninety days after writing and sending her letter of resignation to her employer. Her complaint alleged, inter alia, that she had been…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Caldwell v. FoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Matras v. Amoco Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Cardinal Mooney High School v. Michigan High School Athletic Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Orzel v. Scott Drug Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Sumner v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Trettco, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Paige v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Richard Agnew Linda Agnew v. Basf Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  4. Strozinsky v. School District of Brown DeerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Balmer v. Hawkeye SteelSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API