Legal Opinion
Corra v. Energizer Holdings, Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided August 2, 2013No. 1:12-cv-01736-AWI-SKOPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
ANTHONY W. ISHII, Senior District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Defendants Energizer Holdings, Inc., et al., have filed a motion to dismiss the first *1211amended complaint without leave to amend. Plaintiff Aida Corra has filed a motion for leave to file a second amended complaint. For reasons discussed below, Defendants’ motion shall be granted in part and denied in part; Plaintiffs motion shall be denied as moot.
II. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The Court refers the parties to previous orders for a…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Dapeer v. Neutrogena Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2015
- Eckler v. Neutrogena Corp. CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Gisvold v. Merck & Co.District Court, S.D. California · 2014
- Crowell v. FCA U.S. LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2024
- Debt Cleanse Group Legal Services, LLC v. GoTo Technologies USA, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2024
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.