Legal Opinion

State v. Schoemperlena

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 12, 1907No. Nos. 15,142-(16)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Defendant was convicted in the district court for Lyon county of the crime of grand larceny in the second degree and upon his request under R. L. 1905, § 5409, the case was certified to the supreme court by Olsen, J.

1Opinion of the CourtJaggard, J.

The indictment charged that the defendant at a time and place mentioned, having in his possession, custody, and control as bailee of named persons, certain described personal property of specified value, the property of named persons, converted and appropriated the same to his own use. On trial defendant objected to the introduction of any testimony on behalf of the state on the ground that the indictment did not state facts sufficient to constitute a public offense, in that it did not state the purpose or use for which the property was intrusted to the defendant. The objection was overruled,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. HoltonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  2. State v. BarrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. MarxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  2. State v. McCulloughSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API