Legal Opinion

State v. McCullough

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 6, 1923No. 23,638PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

The defendant was indicted for the crime of larceny as defined in the second subdivision of section 8870, G. S. 1913 — the crime known as embezzlement under prior statutes.

The indictment charges that defendant was an officer of the Dan-vers Farmers State Bank, that as such officer he had in his possession, custody and control eight government bonds (described in detail) which bonds were the personal property of one Andrew Lye, and that he wilfully and feloniously appropriated said bonds and sold them without the knowledge of consent of said Lye, with intent to deprive and defraud…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. HolmesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  2. State v. KortgaardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  3. Gomulak v. C. A. Smith Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  4. State v. FellowsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  5. State v. HoltonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API