State ex rel. Department of Transportation v. Glenn
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1DissentButtler, J.
The majority decides that defendants are not entitled to: (1) damages for the cost of removing unattached personal property from the real property taken; (2) damages for consequential injury to unattached personal property; (3) damages resulting from relocation of personal property; or (4) for loss of profits to their cattle operation. Since defendants do not claim damages on any of those grounds, I dissent and remind the majority to "look for the doughnut, not the hole.”
Defendants’ claim, alleged separately as one for "special damages,” is that plaintiffs taking possession of the real…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tomasek v. Oregon State Highway CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1952
- Cereghino v. State Highway CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1962
- Lanning v. State Highway CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- State Highway Commission v. VellaOregon Supreme Court · 1958
- La Grande v. RumelhartOregon Supreme Court · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.