Legal Opinion

Dalrymple v. State

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1967No. 8304PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARMODY, Justice.

Appellant seeks a reversal of the trial court’s order which dismissed his petition to set aside a judgment and sentence.

Although termed a petition for writ of coram nobis, the trial court considered it, and so do we, as a petition for post-conviction relief under Rule 93 (§ 21-1-1 (93), N.M.S.A.1953).

On November 27, 1964, appellant pleaded guilty to one count of robbery, but was not at that time sentenced because an information was immediately filed charging him with being an habitual offender. On January 12, 1965, following a jury verdict with respect to the habitual…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. OrtegaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  3. State v. DalrympleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
  4. State v. DalrympleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. LeybaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Toby Joe Gutierrez v. Dan Moriarty, Warden, Attorney General of the State of New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  3. State v. KnerrNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. State v. AdamsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Toby Joe Gutierrez v. Dan Moriarty, Warden, Attorney General of the State of New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API