Legal Opinion
Hedden v. Folio
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 13, 1960PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
62 N.J. Super. 470 (1960)
163 A.2d 163
PATRICK L. HEDDEN AND LAWRENCE R. HEDDEN T/A PATRICK L. HEDDEN AGENCY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
FRANK J. FOLIO AND RUTH FOLIO, HIS WIFE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued June 21, 1960.
Decided July 13, 1960.
Before Judges PRICE, SULLIVAN and FOLEY.
Mr. Richard C. McDonough argued the cause for plaintiffs-appellants (Messrs. McDonough & Sullivan, attorneys).
Mr. William P. Elliott argued the cause for defendants-respondents (Messrs. Bunker, Elliott & Mooney, attorneys).
The opinion of the court was delivered by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Richard v. FalletiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Blau v. FriedmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Winter v. ToldtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
- J. R. Tucker, Inc. v. MahaffeySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1928
- Clark v. JelsmaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Brenner and Co. v. PerlNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
- Van Winkle & Liggett v. G.B.R. Fabrics, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
- Fry v. DoyleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- Van Wagner v. EnzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
- Feist & Feist Realty v. DocksideNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.