Legal Opinion

Frank K. Kotarski v. V.L. Cooper, A.E. Navarro, W.J. Tinston, J.H. Kirkpatrick, Naval Air Rework Facility, Capt. P.A. Monroe, in His Official Capacity

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 16, 1986No. 84-5673Published

1Opinion of the Court

799 F.2d 1342

41 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 36,479, 55 USLW 2200

Frank K. KOTARSKI, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

V.L. COOPER, A.E. Navarro, W.J. Tinston, J.H. Kirkpatrick,

Naval Air Rework Facility, Capt. P.A. Monroe, in

his official capacity, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 84-5673.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Jan. 11, 1985.

Decided Sept. 16, 1986.

Frank K. Kotarski, in pro. per.

Richard A. Olderman, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for defendants-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California.

Before NELSON, CANBY and HALL,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API