Legal Opinion

Carlos v. Lovett & Gould

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 23, 2006PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*848In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Brands, J.), dated November 3, 2004, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied his cross motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In September 1996 the plaintiff, then the Chief of Police of the Town of Putnam Valley Police Department (hereinafter the police department), retained the defendants to prosecute a federal civil rights action against the Town…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Volpe v. CanfieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Wei Cheng Chang v. PiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. Carlos v. SantosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  4. Iannarone v. GramerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. Tropp v. LumerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Buczek v. Dell & Little, LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  2. Quinones v. Neighborhood Youth & Family Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. Velasquez v. KatzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. Overgard v. HobbsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API