Legal Opinion

Overgard v. Hobbs

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 19, 2007Published

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, the defendant Birbrower, Montalbano, Condon & Frank, P.C., now known as Montalbano, Condon & Frank, EC., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Liebowitz, J.), dated November 21, 2006, which denied *681its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant Birbrower, Montalbano, Condon & Frank, P.C., now known as Montalbano, Condon & Frank, P.C. (hereinafter BMC & F) established its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Volpe v. CanfieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. John Grace & Co. v. Tunstead, Schechter & TorreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Gardner v. JaconAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. Tropp v. LumerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  5. DeFalco v. CutaiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API