Consolidated Hydro, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge BUCKLEY.
BUCKLEY, Circuit Judge:
Consolidated Hydro, Inc. petitions for review of a determination by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission that a hydroelectric project at Damariscotta Mills in Lincoln County, Maine is subject to its licensing jurisdiction because it is located on “navigable waters” as defined in the Federal Power Act. Petitioner challenges as unsupported by substantial evidence the agency’s alternative findings that (1) the stream on which the project is located has been used for purposes of interstate commerce; and (2) even if,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- The Daniel BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- United States v. Appalachian Electric Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Montana Power Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Sawczyk v. United States Coast GuardDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1980
- Sierra Pacific Power Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- National Ass'n of Home Builders v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- Turlock Irrigation District v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- FPL Energy Maine Hydro LLC v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- James M. Knott, Sr. Riverdale Power & Electric Co., Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Lofthus v. Long Beach Veterans HospitalDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.