Legal Opinion
Turlock Irrigation District v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided May 15, 2015No. 13-1250, 13-1253PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Senior Circuit Judge SENTELLE.
SENTELLE, Senior Circuit Judge:
In the proceeding under review, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission determined that La Grange Hydroelectric Project (“Project”) fell within the mandatory licensing provisions of the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. §1 817(1), for three independent reasons, which we will discuss more fully below. The owners of the Project, Turlock Irrigation District and Modesto Irrigation District (collectively, “Districts”) petition for review of FERC’s order, Turlock Irrigation Disk & Modesto Irrigation Disk, Order…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Whitmore Ex Rel. Simmons v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Food & Water Watch, Inc. v. Thomas VilsackCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Pub. Citizen, Inc. v. TrumpCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- New England Anti-Vivisection Society v. United States Fish & Wildlife ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- National Fair Housing Alliance v. Travelers Indemnity CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- American Lung Association v. EPACourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2021
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.